Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 9 Next >>
Topic: Should teen Super-heroes grow up? (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Manuel Tavares
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 02 December 2009
Location: Portugal
Posts: 407
Posted: 07 July 2013 at 3:42pm | IP Logged | 1  

So NOW is forever.
Is more or less the same thing as the Silver Age time.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Aaron Smith
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 September 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 10461
Posted: 07 July 2013 at 3:55pm | IP Logged | 2  

So time should stay still in the Super hero Universes?

***

Comics-universe time is something unique. Time has to pass from one story to the next, obviously, but at the same time, the characters should stay in their ideal forms at their ideal ages. For example, while Batman has been doing his thing for long enough to be an experienced crimefighter and have taken on a sidekick and faced his most prominent foes a number of times, he must remain in his athletic prime as a man of a certain age.  
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Kip Lewis
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 March 2011
Posts: 2880
Posted: 07 July 2013 at 3:57pm | IP Logged | 3  

Haven't we discussed this before?

Pros and cons to both views. When I came to comics,
characters aged. Franklin got older, Peter graduated
from college. Johnny grew. Three members of the FF were
made younger due to a Skrull aging ray. Robin aged, even
before he became Nightwing. The LOSH grew up.

Maybe even the presence of Superboy made aging a norm to
me.

So aging to me might be as fundamental to superhero as
costumes. Maybe that is why I like periodic reboots.

On the other hand Ultimate Spider-man not aging never
bothered me in over 100 issues. But then they kill him.

Edited by Kip Lewis on 07 July 2013 at 4:00pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Monte Gruhlke
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3303
Posted: 07 July 2013 at 4:12pm | IP Logged | 4  

I really enjoy Grayson as Nightwing, but overall I lean towards the idea that teenage characters never grow up.

Case in point: Peter Parker started out in high school... and after a while Marvel brought him to college... and the lines began to blur even more these days as he (and his previous H.S. cast) seem to be eeking into the early 30's. The Spider-Man of all our youths seems to have vanished entirely.

Take this one further: What happens when DC decides to take a few of the current Teen-Titans and make them become grown up?
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
DW Zomberg
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 June 2012
Posts: 444
Posted: 07 July 2013 at 4:18pm | IP Logged | 5  

Everybody loves Nightwing.

More like too many fans love knock-offs of existing characters.

Back to Top profile | search
 
William Roberge
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 July 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 11293
Posted: 07 July 2013 at 4:20pm | IP Logged | 6  

No.
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Manuel Tavares
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 02 December 2009
Location: Portugal
Posts: 407
Posted: 07 July 2013 at 4:29pm | IP Logged | 7  

"More like too many fans love knock-offs of existing characters."
DW Zomberg
~~~~~~~~~~
It's curious,tough. To think how could readers wanted to get rid so readily of Robin and wind up with so many Robins as mantle bearers. 
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
William T. Byrd
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 04 August 2009
Posts: 209
Posted: 07 July 2013 at 4:46pm | IP Logged | 8  

When I was younger, I wanted characters to age as I did. I thought that characters should die/retire and be replaced as time passed. Why should we still be reading stories about the same charcters in the same settings and circumstances 20 or 30 years after their creation? Why arent creators coming up with characters as popular as the ones created decades ago instead of standing on the shoulders of previous creators?

As I got older I realized how selfish it was to want to deprive future generations of the characters I enjoyed as a kid.


Back to Top profile | search
 
Robert Bradley
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 September 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 4834
Posted: 07 July 2013 at 4:55pm | IP Logged | 9  

Aging the characters was a big mistake.

Topical reference like combat service or current presidents should be kept to a bare minimum and tying comic book events to specific historical events should probably be avoided at all costs.

By the time the 1960's were winding down the writers and editors should have known that comics were going to be around for a while and references to things like Viet Nam and Watergate in the 70's weren't a good idea in the long run (they should have had an idea from just looking at the WWII characters running around and the lengths that were being taken to explain their activity at an advanced age).  Except that some of the writers of the 70's couldn't help but use the stories to voice their political viewpoints.

This lack of long-term planning was magnified by aging characters like Franklin Richards and Dick Grayson.

Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Joe Zhang
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12857
Posted: 07 July 2013 at 5:21pm | IP Logged | 10  

Never!
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Rich Marzullo
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 13 January 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 2702
Posted: 07 July 2013 at 5:26pm | IP Logged | 11  

Nope. No aging.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Carmen Bernardo
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 August 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 3666
Posted: 07 July 2013 at 5:59pm | IP Logged | 12  

   When I started out reading comics, I was almost exclusively exposed to Marvel's characters, who aged, however imperceptibly it seemed at times. I had an origin issue of Amazing Spider-Man where it was explained that he started out as a high school student and was now in college, so I accepted the premise. I saw DC characters differently, since most of them were basically the same as they were when introduced about a decade or two before the Marvel superheroes.

   By the time DC started aping Marvel in having its characters age, that image of Robin as the Boy Wonder stuck, and so it was a bit odd to see him doing adult things in Wolfman & Perez's New Teen Titans. Not long after that, characters in both companies seemed to age at different rates, so that you now have the New Mutants as adults, Generation X as college students, and "Academy X" mutants still as senior high school or junior college students. All of this while the original and second-generation X-Men never seemed to have aged. As a result, I'd accept aging in comicbook characters if they were done right.
Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 9 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login