Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
Star Trek
Byrne Robotics > Star Trek << Prev Page of 448 Next >>
Topic: STAR TREK: NEW VISIONS - Origins and Updates Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Mark Haslett
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 4641
Posted: 11 February 2013 at 12:32pm | IP Logged | 1 post reply

I love this idea.

For what it's worth, my reaction to your questions about the "rules" all boils down to: how good can you make it look?

Bringing in new elements and actors sounds great to me if they look "native" enough in the end product. Knowing how tough that can be, part of me leans to wishing for a "bottle episode," in hopes that the visuals will look more seamless.

Your cut-and-paste sample above looks terrific to me.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Greg Kirkman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 15659
Posted: 11 February 2013 at 12:55pm | IP Logged | 2 post reply

Guest Stars. Would I want to feature characters "returning"? A story I long ago wanted to explore, for instance, was the return of Gary Mitchell.

+++++++++

I find myself a bit surprised by this--the second pilot told a complete and satisfying tale, after all. I'm not all that big on revisiting stories that had a definitive ending ("Space Seed" being a clear exception). Still, I have no doubt that you'd bring Mitchell back in a very interesting and logical way! I'm intrigued.

++++++++++++

Post-TOS Continuity. In my IDW series I have already visited the characters as they were after the show. While this project would be set "between episodes" in the original, would I be bound to what we know from what came later? Could I finally do "The Face of Fear", and "reveal" why the Klingons looked so different in TMP, or does the ENTERPRISE resolution block that path? This is, after all, the kind of project that would be endlessly dissected by the overly anal fanboys, and while I generally care not a whit about what they might think, I also don't want to just HAND them their ammunition!

+++++++++++

I suppose it would come down to which is more important to you--the challenge of staying inside canon, or the fun of letting loose!

I also think it would be interesting to see how you'd handle incorporating movie-era screencaps into a story, by using it as a framing sequence that surrounds a TOS flashback story, since the movies introduced the "crunchy" Klingons!

 

And, since this would essentially be fanfic, you should do whatever you freaking want.

Hey, if fanboys can write their own fanfic that doesn't play along with canon, why can't you? After all, it's not as if this would be a professional, officially-licensed STAR TREK story that fans have to pay for. I think an officially-published story should be held to a higher canonical standard than a fun little side-project like this.

But, please, no "Slash"!

+++++++++++++++

Cut and Paste. When I first conceived this project, lo these many years ago, my thought was to use scenes, including dialog, from TOS show ON VIDEO. Doing it in "fumetti" form is, of course, enormously liberating in this respect, since I can have the characters saying entirely different dialog -- but can I drop Character A into Scene Q, where s/he was not before, in order to get the scene/interaction I want? Just how "pure" does this project need to be?

++++++++++++

 

As noted above, I think it comes down to Challenge vs. Fun.

I think it would be awesome to see you go all-out and manipulate images--for example, in a story guest-starring, say, Commodore One, you could simply take existing shots of the Enterprise and replace the name/registry number to turn her into the Yorktown.

Using photo-manipulation (and maybe 3-D modeling for new ships and sets and such) would allow for some very cool scenarios which would not be possible otherwise.

On the flipside, creativity thrives on restrictions, and I'd also love to see what you could do with just the raw TOS screencaps.

 

Or, you could, y'know, do both! Why stop with just one of these stories?

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
James Elliott
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 November 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 481
Posted: 11 February 2013 at 1:39pm | IP Logged | 3 post reply

I really enjoyed the fotonovels when they came out.   I still haven them, but mine didn't age really well.

The idea of cutting and pasting together a new episode from existing footage sounds like it could be nice.  I had a similar thought while watching Arena this weekend.  New episodes in fotonovel format seem like they could be well done now and video format isn't far off (if at all).
Back to Top profile | search
 
Peter Hicks
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 April 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1423
Posted: 11 February 2013 at 3:45pm | IP Logged | 4 post reply

I preferred the photonovels for Alien and Outland that were done as 81/2 X 11 format, with all captions beside the photos rather than as word balloons.  Those were things of beauty, and I would have paid good coin if the Star Trek movies were released in that format. 
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Imaginary X-Man

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 115518
Posted: 11 February 2013 at 9:25pm | IP Logged | 5 post reply

...the second pilot told a complete and satisfying tale...

Personally, I have a hard time being "satisfied" with a god-like being meeting his end by having a large rock dropped on him. This was, after all, someone who, only moments earlier, had resisted fire from a phaser rifle!

Back to Top profile | search
 
Greg Kirkman
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 15659
Posted: 11 February 2013 at 10:57pm | IP Logged | 6 post reply

Personally, I have a hard time being "satisfied" with a god-like being meeting his end by having a large rock dropped on him. This was, after all, someone who, only moments earlier, had resisted fire from a phaser rifle!

+++++++++++

Odd...I've never stopped to question that ending!

Mitchell resists phaser-fire, yes. But, Dehner then lays the psionic whammie on him, which causes his powers to temporarily disappear. His silver orbs return just as Kirk is about to deliver a killing blow.

However, I've always taken it that Mitchell simply wasn't back to full power after Dehner's attack (although he does display super-strength), which allowed Kirk to crush him under that rock.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Joe Boster
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 29 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 3159
Posted: 11 February 2013 at 11:01pm | IP Logged | 7 post reply

I'm in the cut loose camp. 3d models, cut and paste and anything you can think of! "Face of fear" sounds very cool. 
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Imaginary X-Man

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 115518
Posted: 12 February 2013 at 6:21am | IP Logged | 8 post reply

However, I've always taken it that Mitchell simply wasn't back to full power after Dehner's attack (although he does display super-strength), which allowed Kirk to crush him under that rock.

Tho Dehner, who has not had the power as long as Mitchell, and is presumably therefore not as strong, is able to survive his attack long enough to make an apologetic speech to Kirk after Mitchell's "death". Add to this that the captain of the Valiant had to blow up his ship in order to destroy his own "mutate", and simply crushing Mitchell -- with the rock he intended for Kirk -- seems more ironic than practical.

In other words, an ending that suits the writer's needs, and not really the parameters of the story.

(When this episode first aired, I was but an innocent wee lad of 16, and would never, ever have presumed to question what any television episode told me. Yet, the next day in school, as I reviewed "Where No Man has Gone Before" in my mind, I found myself thinking Now, wait a minute...)

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Imaginary X-Man

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 115518
Posted: 12 February 2013 at 6:24am | IP Logged | 9 post reply

But, please, no "Slash"!

I don't know what this means. Should I be glad of that?

Back to Top profile | search
 
James Woodcock
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 September 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4892
Posted: 12 February 2013 at 6:33am | IP Logged | 10 post reply

You sweet, innocent man you.

Would that I could say I have never come across an expanation as to what that means.

Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Imaginary X-Man

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 115518
Posted: 12 February 2013 at 6:33am | IP Logged | 11 post reply

Perusing the screen shots of "Man Trap" this morning, to be certain there were not enough to complete this project properly, I decided to amuse myself my tinkering in a TREK "tradition" that had not made itself known when this episode was filmed.

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Imaginary X-Man

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 115518
Posted: 12 February 2013 at 6:38am | IP Logged | 12 post reply

All right, then! If I am going to build a "lost episode", I must now decide how to begin. Do I come up with my story, first? Or do I go thru the available images on TREKCore.com and build a "library" for each character, set, prop, vessel, etc?

The latter seems the most logical approach, somehow. Clicking thru the collected images, and knowing how my brain works, I am most likely to find a story "growing" (just as I did yesterday, introducing "Mirror" Kirk into a shot where he did not appear before. Hmm... "Broken Mirror"...?)

Back to Top profile | search
 

<< Prev Page of 448 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login