Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum << Prev Page of 13 Next >>
Topic: Organic Web Shooters (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
Robert LaGuardia
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 November 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 1296
Posted: 06 August 2009 at 2:32pm | IP Logged | 1  

As I recall the movies made it known several times that Peter was an abnormally  bright student. If you don't like the idea of organic web shooters that's fine, but it's disingenuous to say the movies neglected to make Peter a genius.
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
Posted: 06 August 2009 at 2:34pm | IP Logged | 2  

 Robert L. wrote:
If you don't like the idea of organic web shooters that's fine, but it's disingenuous to say the movies neglected to make Peter a genius.

When did they ever demonstrate this, though?
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133193
Posted: 06 August 2009 at 2:36pm | IP Logged | 3  

As I recall the movies made it known several times that Peter was an abnormally bright student. If you don't like the idea of organic web shooters that's fine, but it's disingenuous to say the movies neglected to make Peter a genius.

••

The second movie did a better job of showing Peter's smarts, but the first only had people talking about it -- a mortal sin in moviemaking. In fact, the most "smart" scene was when Parker tells Osborn he has read on of his papers -- which several civilian friends of mine, bringing no backstory into the theater with them, took as Peter BSing to impress Norman. And the first movie is, of course, the one in which it is most important to show Peter's smarts, in terms of establishing the character -- unless you're Sam Raimi.

Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133193
Posted: 06 August 2009 at 2:37pm | IP Logged | 4  

Why waste time selling pictures to JJJ for pocket change when he could be a rich inventor…

••

Apparently you have no idea how long it takes to patent and copyright an invention -- even assuming you have a lawyer who will do the work for free, up front.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Jeremiah Avery
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 December 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 2431
Posted: 06 August 2009 at 2:59pm | IP Logged | 5  

I can attest to that.  Even if Peter had a lawyer working for free, the USPTO has many filing fees as well as renewal fees (once it's patented) and it can take years before a patent can be issued (and that's if someone else hasn't already invented something analogous).

I always liked the mechanical webshooters.  When he'd run out of web fluid in some issues, Spider-Man had to be more resourceful in overcoming the obstacle.  Plus, as a kid, I thought it was a "cool" device.

Back to Top profile | search
 
Wayde Murray
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 October 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 3115
Posted: 06 August 2009 at 3:18pm | IP Logged | 6  

JB wrote:
The second movie did a better job of showing Peter's smarts, but the first only had people talking about it -- a mortal sin in moviemaking.


Even the second movie fell into the routine of having someone we were shown was smart (Curt Conners, Otto Octavius) talking about how smart Peter was ("gifted, but lazy" was the term, as I recall). But come the end of the movie, it was Octavius who figured out how to overload his runaway device, and who then sacrifice himself to disable it. Even if Peter had been able to figure this one thing out independantly (especially if Octavius had assured him it couldn't be done), it would have been something.

We never saw any real indication that Peter could accomplish more than being a photographer or a pizza delivery guy. While he did many things that could be construed as stupid, he did nothing that demonstrated genius.


Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 133193
Posted: 06 August 2009 at 3:24pm | IP Logged | 7  

Am I misremembering? I have watched the movie only once, but I thought there was a chat between Peter and Octavius at the dinner table that showed young Mr. Parker could hold his own on an intellectual level? Certainly something more convincing than "I read your paper."
Back to Top profile | search
 
Jeremiah Avery
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 December 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 2431
Posted: 06 August 2009 at 3:29pm | IP Logged | 8  

From what I remember, Octavius was talking about his work and Peter was asking how he overcame certain hurdles.  That, at least to me, conveyed he knew more than just what was in a paper Octavius may have written.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
Posted: 06 August 2009 at 3:51pm | IP Logged | 9  

There's a (horrible) transcript here (horrible because none of the speakers are labelled).

Anyway, Peter is writing a paper on Dr. Octavius and is introduced to him by Dr. Connors. At some point, the exchange goes thusly:
Peter Parker: So is that it? (referring to Octavius' invention)   

Otto Octavius: Yes. My design to initiate and sustain fusion.

PP: I understand you use harmonics of atomic frequencies.

OO: Sympathetic frequencies.

PP: Harmonic reinforcement?

OO: Go on.

PP: An exponential increase in energy output.

OO: A huge amount of energy. Like a perpetual sun providing renewable power for the whole world.

PP: Are you sure you could stabilize the fusion reaction?

OO: Peter, what have we been talking about for the last hour and a half? This is my life's work.
I certainly know the consequences of the slightest miscalculation.

PP: I'm sorry. I didn't mean to question you.
I'm actually not sure who is saying "Harmonic reinforcement," "Go on" or "An exponential increase..." thanks to the crappy transcript. Perhaps someone else can confirm.

Anyway, later, when Peter asks how to stop the device, Doc Ock tells him it can't be stopped, except by drowning it.

So, basically, it seems Peter's intelligence is barely hinted at.


Edited by Paulo Pereira on 06 August 2009 at 3:55pm
Back to Top profile | search
 
Robert LaGuardia
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 November 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 1296
Posted: 06 August 2009 at 4:00pm | IP Logged | 10  


 QUOTE:
The second movie did a better job of showing Peter's smarts, but the first only had people talking about it -- a mortal sin in moviemaking. In fact, the most "smart" scene was when Parker tells Osborn he has read on of his papers -- which several civilian friends of mine, bringing no backstory into the theater with them, took as Peter BSing to impress Norman. And the first movie is, of course, the one in which it is most important to show Peter's smarts, in terms of establishing the character -- unless you're Sam Raimi.

I do agree that the second movie demonstrated Peters intelligence better, but as I recall, and I say this after unsuccessfully looking for the script online, that opening scene with Osborne did not play as if Peter was trying to impress him.   I'm still trying to remember, didn't Peter have some more science talk with Osborn at some point later on?

Let me ask this. Would you have had the same problem if they made the spider genetically manipulated to be able to shoot webs out of it's legs? Or is the building of the web shooters specifically important also? I ask this sincerely to get a grasp on where the problem lies. I
And on a related topic, JB how do you feel about the scene showing the hairs on his fingers. I thought it was visually interesting and well done, but  the scene following where he starts climbing the wall doesn't "sell" the idea to me.


Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
Posted: 06 August 2009 at 4:16pm | IP Logged | 11  

Click here for the SPIDER-MAN transcript.
Back to Top profile | search
 
Peyton Holden
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 15 February 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 424
Posted: 06 August 2009 at 4:38pm | IP Logged | 12  

Thanks, Kevin!
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 

<< Prev Page of 13 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login