Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login
The John Byrne Forum
Byrne Robotics > The John Byrne Forum Page of 4 Next >>
Topic: Animal Smarts (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 132292
Posted: 21 September 2008 at 5:51am | IP Logged | 1  

My pool has evidently become the place to meet and greet for the local raccoon population.

This has been the second summer since I moved into this house that I decided not to uncover the pool. Not enough use out of it, versus the expense of the upkeep. Since the middle off July, tho, I had been noticing a wet patch, about four feet square, in the middle of the cover each morning, and also that this patch was often strewn with small stones.

At first I was putting this down to separate events. Perhaps the wind had rolled the stones to the edge of the cover, and, since it saggs slightly toward the middle, gravity had taken care of the rest. And perhaps that sag somehow accounted for the wet patch. (Can a pool experience tides?)

Then, about two weeks ago, I noticed the footprints. Handprints more like. That distinctive, almost human shape is what finally clued me in to what was going on. Raccoons, as anyone who has ever watched a Nature show probably knows, like to wash their food. And the locals have obviously figured out that if they carry their food into the center of my pool cover, their weight will push the cover down to the level of the water in the pool, and they will have a small, private pond to do their washing.

And that's where my thread title comes in -- cuz, ya know, it seems to me like that's not something a raccoon would have discovered accidentally. Oh, sure, I can see where a coon family might have come waddling across the yard and, without realizing what it was or what would happen, across the pool cover. But once the water appeared and then disappeared as they moved on, it would have demanded at least a degree of reason for the raccoons to not only figure out what was happening, but that they could repeat the process deliberately. And make use of it.

Small digression. Just yesterday I was reading about the reason moths fly into lightbulbs and, more fatally, candle flames. Simply stated, it has to do with the way they use fixed, distant light sources, like the Sun and Moon, to navigate. Since those light sources are at what is called "optical infinity", their light rays, reaching the moth's compound eyes are, for all intents and purposes, parallel. So the moth can fix on that light coming in at a particular angle and travel in a straight line from point to point. But candles and lightbulbs and all other such form of artificial light are much, much closer than the Sun and Moon, and so the light from them radiates, like the spokes from a wheel. A moth that tries to follow the light from a candle will, in fact, spiral in and immolate itself. The problem is that artificial light is too new, and moths have not had the chance to adapt to it, on an evolutionary basis. And moths, unlike raccoons, don't do much in the way of thinking, at least so far as we know.

But here, with the Coon Crew's use of my pool cover, we see animals adapting to something for which their evolutionary track can in no way have prepared them. There is no natural equivalent to a pool cover stretched out just far enough above the water that the weight of the animal will push it down into that water. This is something the raccoons (at least one of them) have to have figured out. And then remembered, from night to night. Smart!

And then one of them learns to say "No". . . .

Back to Top profile | search
 
Bill Collins
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 May 2005
Location: England
Posts: 11249
Posted: 21 September 2008 at 5:54am | IP Logged | 2  

That`s one for the Creationists!
Back to Top profile | search e-mail
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 132292
Posted: 21 September 2008 at 5:54am | IP Logged | 3  

Come again?
Back to Top profile | search
 
Ted Pugliese
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 December 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 7979
Posted: 21 September 2008 at 7:06am | IP Logged | 4  

Wait until they start asking you to open up the pool for them :-)

I am amazed by how they get into my trash cans, even eating through the lids when they have to.
Back to Top profile | search | www
 
Tom French
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 07 January 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 4154
Posted: 21 September 2008 at 7:11am | IP Logged | 5  

My dog figured out that to open the trash can, all he has to do is put his paw on the floor pedal and push.  That cracks me up. 

Not as stunning as the raccoon story -- which is pretty damn amazing -- but still... 

Why is it so hard for some folks to assign intelligence to animals?  Is it simply ego? 

Back to Top profile | search
 
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
Posted: 21 September 2008 at 7:15am | IP Logged | 6  

Great story, but I'm honestly surprised raccoons aren't even smarter than they are, considering those clever paws of theirs.
Back to Top profile | search
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 132292
Posted: 21 September 2008 at 7:25am | IP Logged | 7  

Why is it so hard for some folks to assign intelligence to animals? Is it
simply ego?

••

Of course! A not-so-healthy mixture of hubris and religion. Virtually every
faith teaches that Man is the top of the ladder -- already a fatuous image --
and that all creatures (including women!) are inferior. This despite the vast
amounts of evidence that they are not.

One of the things I find most frustrating is the idea that animals are not
"conscious". That "consciousness" is unique to humans. This despite
studies in which animals have demonstrated amazing amounts of self
awareness (including male chimps masturbating at pictures of female
chimps!). This little incident with the raccoons in my yard seems to indicate
a high level of consciousness. An awareness of and ability to adapt to their
environment on a moment to moment basis. As we do. "Hey, look what just
happened! Go see if it will happen again."
Back to Top profile | search
 
Paulo Pereira
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 April 2006
Posts: 15539
Posted: 21 September 2008 at 7:28am | IP Logged | 8  


 QUOTE:
(including male chimps masturbating at pictures of female chimps!)


Wow...
Back to Top profile | search
 
Matthew Chartrand
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 June 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 1357
Posted: 21 September 2008 at 8:25am | IP Logged | 9  

Great business opportunity, Porn for chimps. Of course you would have to accept payment in bananas.

 

 

 

 

Back to Top profile | search
 
Martin Arlt
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 April 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 879
Posted: 21 September 2008 at 9:06am | IP Logged | 10  

"Of course! A not-so-healthy mixture of hubris and religion. Virtually every
faith teaches that Man is the top of the ladder -- already a fatuous image --
and that all creatures (including women!) are inferior."\

===

Heck, I'd go a step (or rung!) further.  Many still seem to think that man is not at the top of the ladder, but rather above or separate from it.  We are not part of a continuum with animals, because man isn't an animal. 

And for those that accept evolution, many still hold onto the outdated notion of one organism being "more evolved" than another, which is a completely meaningless statement without an environmental context.  Is man more evolved than a fish?  Well, what happens when you put a person at the bottom of a lake for ten minutes (or a fish out of it, for that matter).

Anyway, of course animals have varying levels of reason and intelligence.  Evolution is a continuum, and man's reason and self-awareness didn't just manifest out of thin air (although I know many people think it did...).

Martin Arlt...............................

 

Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
Lars Johansson
Byrne Robotics Member
Avatar

Joined: 04 June 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 6113
Posted: 21 September 2008 at 9:15am | IP Logged | 11  

including male chimps masturbating at pictures of female
chimps!).

"Next time we'll keep the pictures of female chimps out of the c*m radius, boys!"



Edited by Lars Johansson on 21 September 2008 at 9:16am
Back to Top profile | search | www e-mail
 
John Byrne
Avatar
Grumpy Old Guy

Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 132292
Posted: 21 September 2008 at 9:23am | IP Logged | 12  

Many still seem to think that man is not at the top of the ladder, but rather
above or separate from it. We are not part of a continuum with animals,
because man isn't an animal.

••

Even amongst my most intelligent and enlightened friends, I can still raise
an eyebrow here and there when I use the phrase "other members of
the Animal Kingdom" when describing critters who are not us.
Back to Top profile | search
 

Page of 4 Next >>
  Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Active Topics | Member List | Search | Help | Register | Login